MCNAUGHTEN BRIDGE

Closure of McNaughten Bridge

Upon seeing the effects that ice and the spring melt had on the foundations of this small bridge, the Town mandated Shellex Consulting Group to inspect the bridge.  Their findings were:

  • Although the superstructure is in relatively good condition, the foundations of the footbridge were destabilized by the effects of ice and high water levels last winter.  
  • The foundations, as well as the footbridge itself, are artisanal in nature and are directly supported on the ground and on rocks
  • There is a significant risk of further torsion and collapse of the bridge with bank erosion
  • the bearing capacity of the abutment is insufficient, thus destabilizing the entire structure.

What does this mean?

In the short term, the bridge is condemned, and it will have to be removed and replaced. As the bridge’s foundation is on the banks of a waterway, the Town of Hudson cannot proceed with the replacement of the foundations until it receives the necessary approval from the Ministry of the Environment. This approval process will take a minimum of one year. 

Frequently Asked Questions:

Why must the bridge be removed?
Why do we need the approval of the Ministry of the Environment?
Why did we commission an engineering report?
Who did the report and how much did it cost?
Are there any temporary measures that can be put in place to have a usable bridge by the beginning of the school year?
Can the bridge be declared part of an active corridor, and thus fall under the Ministry of Transport’s responsibility?
Why not just replace the bridge and ignore the bureaucracy?
Is Council aware of the importance of the footbridge to residents?
Do we know the cost of a replacement bridge?
How long will it take for the MRC to authorize the work?
Will a local company be given the job?
Can we get a second opinion?